In fiscal year 2025 Amazon reported $717B in revenue against Berkshire Hathaway's $371B, 1.93× as much.
| Measure | AMZN | BRK-B | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $717B | $371B | ×1.93 |
| Operating income | $80.0B | $82.5B | ×1.03 |
| Net income | $77.7B | $67.0B | ×1.16 |
| Total assets | $818B | $1.22T | ×1.49 |
| Total liabilities | $407B | $502B | ×1.23 |
| Shareholders' equity | $411B | $717B | ×1.75 |
| Cash | $86.8B | $52.6B | ×1.65 |
| Net margin | 10.8% | 18.0% | ×1.66 |
| Operating margin | 11.2% | 22.2% | ×1.99 |
| Operating cash flow | $140B | $46.0B | ×3.03 |
| Capital expenditure | $132B | $20.9B | ×6.30 |
| Free cash flow | $7.7B | $25.0B | ×3.25 |
| Income tax expense | $19.1B | $15.2B | ×1.26 |
| Share buybacks | $0 | $2.9B | — |
The larger of the two figures is in bold. Larger is not automatically better: on debt, cost and tax a bigger number is simply a bigger number. This site reports the figures and leaves the judgement to you.
Revenue, year by year
Amazon · 2016–2025
Berkshire Hathaway · 2011–2025
Every row links to its own SEC filing · Fiscal year 2025 · Data as of September 25, 2026
Cite this page
Ready-made references for the figures on this page, as published on September 25, 2026.
Wikipedia
{{cite web |title=Amazon vs Berkshire Hathaway |url=https://companiesranked.com/en/compare/amazon-vs-berkshire-hathaway |website=CompaniesRanked |date=2026-09-25 |language=en}}APA 7
CompaniesRanked. (September 25, 2026). Amazon vs Berkshire Hathaway. CompaniesRanked. https://companiesranked.com/en/compare/amazon-vs-berkshire-hathawayBibTeX
@misc{companiesranked-en-compare-amazon-vs-berkshire-hathaway-2026,
author = {{CompaniesRanked}},
title = {{Amazon vs Berkshire Hathaway}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://companiesranked.com/en/compare/amazon-vs-berkshire-hathaway}},
note = {Compiled from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings; data as of 2026-09-25},
urldate = {2026-09-25}
}The figures are rebuilt with every data refresh, so the reference carries the publication date. Add your own access date if your style requires one.